Lovegrove Mathematicals

logo

"Dedicated to making Likelinesses the entity of prime interest"

Law of Succession

one over N

Partition the expression on the RHS by drawing a vertical line through the + signs. On the left, we have one over N; this is LS(N)(i). On the right, we have relative frequency; this is RF(i|h). Consequently, likeliness symbol lies weakly between LS(N)(i) and RF(i|h).

The Law of Succession was first proposed by Laplace in 1812. It represents one of the earliest cases of the confusion between probability and likeliness: it is often described (and was so described by Laplace) as giving a probability, whereas it actually gives an average probability, that is a likeliness.

Over the years, it has had a very bad press, partly because of that confusion. The main reason, however, was because Laplace mishandled his presentation of it. In seeking to demonstrate when the Law of Succession should not be used, he purposely gave the silly example of calculating the probability that the Sun will rise tomorrow. Unfortunately, he did not say that it was silly until after he had given it, by which time the damage had been done in the readers' minds.

Laplace's own version was about the degree 2 case. It was later extended by others to the degree N case used here.